Dolanon March 28, at In the play, No Sugar, by Western Australian playwright, Jack Davis, the dominant reading in the text also appears to be a post colonial reading. We see this attempt to pass the European view of what it means to be civilised onto the Indigenous Australians in having them dance to a brass band, though this may be seen as a union the audience finds out that the Aboriginal people are still expressed as being the villain in the media, a representation of societies current attitudes.
At very early stages of the play we see the presence of European culture being translated into the lives of indigenous Australians, with the two children playing cricket and another, Joe, reading the newspaper. Both of these actions are ver typical European activities in particular English activities.
The names of the characters that the audience is provided with is also important as we see very standard European names being given to the characters who are all Indigenous Australians, this presents the idea of normality and standardising being used to control cultures and slowly dispose of them.
The language being spoken does appear to English however not well practiced, shown through difficulty in reading, we also see the desire for their past culture to escape in out burst and small pieces of their native tongue coming through in the dialogue.
We also begin to see a rejection of the European culture through the families reactions and attitude of the Europeans being this entity of otherness. While this symbol of the axe may foreshadow future events it certainly reflects past events of the Aboriginal blood shed that is described as being almost justified in the paper through the supposed hardships and perils of the settlers.
Jack Davis very clearly expresses the desire for the audience to interpret his play, No Sugar, through a post colonial reading. Though in Australian contemporary society this may face some difficulties due to there still being the presence of racism; the post colonial reading is definitely both the dominant and it would be assumed the most widely accepted reading of the play.
Peter, on March 29, at When we look at our own Australian culture, we see its ties from all of the various other cultures that it has spread from. From this we know that the play is about a post — colonization and through the way the children go about their things, a colony that still has strong ties with a European background, even though the kids do not have that very heritage.
We can see this through the two characters David and Cissie who are both playing cricket.
|Visitors to this site||An interactive data visualization of No Sugar's plot and themes.|
|Blog Stats||Set on an Aboriginal Reserve, the Munday and Millimurra families become victims of racist political manoeuvres that force them to move to the Moore River Native Settlement in the s.|
|No Sugar Study Guide from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes||
|Reading Analysis: “No Sugar” | Mr Derby's 12 Literature 3A/3B Class||
We can see from this their ties with a European culture, they are aboriginals and yet they are playing a very British sport. So these two children actually see the new connection with the culture and almost as if they actually want to be a part of it and fit into it.
The character Jimmy on the other hand is much different and he still follows a much more structured way of things, he is seen sharpening a spear which shows that he still holds onto the previous aboriginal values.
With him making the spear and then the water boiling, this actually shows how he instead wants to make up his own cultural values and choose his own way of how he wants to live his life.
The acceptance of European values is also met strongly with the un-acceptance of these values as the characters start to turn away from what they have had enforced on them. The shirt is symbolic of their own culture. When the kid is asked for another shirt because it is dirty, it represents how he is almost being asked to through away his past culture, identity and then put on something over it that represents a European culture.
No Sugar by aboriginal playwright Jack Davis strongly lends itself to a post colonial reading. The position of aboriginals in Australian society has been one that has caused great tension since colonisation, Davis through this text is trying to express the hardships of the aboriginals.
First performed inthe play deals with the struggles of the aboriginal people and oppression in which they endured by white Australian society. The play was set ina time when aboriginal people were not yet accepted as equals in society.
The dialogue used between characters give the audience a direct insight into the views of the aboriginal people. The characters themselves provide the audience with different perspectives of aboriginal society.
This opening extract uses these generic conventions to set the basis for the idea that will be expressed throughout the entire play Jack Davis has used dialogue between the characters in this extract to privilege a postcolonial reading of the text.
Davis uses dialogue in order to construct a world in which the aboriginal people can be identified to the audience as an ill-treated, oppressed race. Davis uses dialogue to represent how the colonised react to the social situations in which they were subjugated to, on a regular basis in the early times of colonisation.
Aw mum, Old Tony the ding always sells us little shrivelled ones and them wetjala kids big fat one. Davis lends this text to a post colonial reading through the use of characterisation. The characters in the play reinforce a post colonial reading of the text, their submission to English culture displays to the audience the effect of colonisation.
Through this extract the characters also begin to read the paper, the combination of the children playing cricket and the elder reading the paper appears from an outside point perspective a very British activity.
A postcolonial reading can also be supported by looking at the context which surrounds the writing of the play. The context of the author has clearly had a major influence in the writing of the play. Jack Davis being an aboriginal has clearly influenced his writing style and the view point that he has taken.Although No Sugar only tangentially deals with this, one particularly despicable policy enacted by the government was the “child removal policy,” which took indigenous children from their families, with the intention of raising them to be as “white” and Western as possible.
Among the summaries and analysis available for No Sugar, there are 2 Short Summaries and 2 Book Reviews. Depending on the study guide provider (SparkNotes, Shmoop, etc.), the resources below will generally offer No Sugar chapter summaries, quotes, and analysis of themes, characters, and symbols.
Start studying No Sugar - Characters. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Mar 21, · READING ANALYSIS: “No Sugar” Western Australia has always had racism present in its culture and society since it was first settled.
Jack Davis’ play No Sugar, presents the audience with Australian identity during the early nineteen hundreds. Jack Davis’s play No Sugar depicts the struggle for survival by the Indigenous population during the Great Depression in Western Australia.
Set on an Aboriginal Reserve, the Munday and Millimurra families become victims of racist political manoeuvres that force them to move to the Moore River Native Settlement in the s. No Sugar Character Analysis Jimmy serves as the voice of protest throughout the play.
Make a list of the ways Jimmy fulfills this role. In Davis’ drama the character Jimmy serves as a voice of protest against the works highlighting of discrimination against Aborigines between to